Laughing at "Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week"

Posted October 8, 2007 | 12:25 PM (EST)



stumbleupon :Laughing at "Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week"   digg: Laughing at "Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week"   reddit: Laughing at "Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week"   del.icio.us: Laughing at "Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week"

An ex-senator that opposes individual rights of women; a pundit that calls people "faggots" and considers Islam a "cult"; a Christian scholar who is considered a "polemicist" and an "Islamophobe" by conservative Christians themselves; and an intellectual who has received millions from "far right" organizations since 2001, are rising up for the rights of women, gays, and religious minorities in the Muslim world. This laughable spectacle is called the Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week. It will be coming to a university near you on October 22 - 26.

Why are they going to universities? Why not these people go to Saudi Arabia or Pakistan and tackle extremism directly? Simple: They consider the university "the institutional base of the left." The same left which "is the enabler and abettor of the terrorist jihad."

In order, thus, to attack the left, these crusaders will be seeking to purposefully trap and target Muslim student groups at various universities. Mathrew Yglesias describes their tactics as follows: "In short, the main goal of the 'David Horowitz Freedom Center' here is to write up a petition deliberately designed to be unlikely for Muslim groups to sign and then to use Muslim groups' failure to sign the petition as evidence that they're on the side of 'our terrorist adversaries.'" The Petition has rightly been described in the blogosphere as akin to The Great Loyalty Oath from the novel Catch-22.

These compassionate crusaders plan on making "the oppression of women in Islam" a "major theme of the week."

Yet, the reality is that the American universities are some of the staunchest supporters of the rights of Muslim women. It was at a university where I met Riffat Hassan, the well-known anti-honor killing activist from the University of Louisville. It was at a university where I met Amina Wadud, the Quran scholar, who was the first woman to lead a mixed-congregation prayer in recent Muslim history and quite courageously challenged Muslim patriarchy. It was at a university where I met Abdullahi An-Naim, the Sudanese Islamic scholar whose message calls for the equality of men and women in and whose teacher was executed in 1983 for such ideas. It was a university where I met Rafia Zakaria, the feminist activist whose commentary on issues affecting Muslim women is published in Pakistan and India. It was at a university where I heard of Laleh Bakhtiar who has now published a feminist translation of the Quran (and we know how important translations of the Quran are in the fight against extremism). It was at a university where I encountered the work of Ziba Mir-Hosseini, the Iranian activist whose speciality is Muslim divorce law, with a focus on women's rights.

It is these universities that the organizers of this initiative are calling "enablers and abettors" of terrorism.

In fact, the universities have been on the forefront of supporting many Muslim reform projects, and the area of Muslim women is not the only one they have supported.

It was at a university where Iranian dissenter and Nobel Prize Winner Shirin Ebadi went to make her speeches (where she extolled not attacking her country). It was at a university where Akbar Ganji, the Iranian dissenter, went to consult with leading left wing philosopher Richard Rorty. It was at a university where a Jewish Studies professor Deborah Lipstadt started to translate anti-holocaust-denial books into Arabic and Farsi. It was a university that gave shelter to Muslim scholars from South Africa whose homes were firebombed.

So, the question to be posed to the organizers of Islamofascism Awareness Week is this: what have they done to support any of the aforementioned academics and activists? By calling the universities "abettors of terrorism", they reveal their contempt of the aforementioned efforts, not support. With the amount of hooting and hollering they have done about women's rights in Islam, I would imagine the next step would be take some of their millions and donate the money to these activists, or better yet, to Muslim women around the world, such as this initiative belonging to Mukhtaran Mai, the survivor of gang-rape and leading feminist activist in Pakistan.

Yet, I suspect that is quite unlikely, because this "awareness" week is not about awareness at all, but using anti-Muslim animus to achieve political ends. The primary political end is to continue the war in Iraq. For example Santorum, one of the featured speakers of the week has previously urged Bush, for "public relations" reasons, to depict the war in Iraq as a greater war against "Islamic Fascism."

Further, one has to wonder what someone like Ann Coulter will be able to accomplish while discussing feminism in the Muslim world when it appears she doesn't find women intellectually capable of having the right to vote. While on the subject of Coulter I find it quite interesting that in the span of a year she has gone from calling Muslims "ragheads" to turning into a Mother Theresa for Muslim women.

Just the other day at one of our universities, a woman-hating, fundamentalist, gay-bashing, religious-supremacist, made a fool of himself, providing a hearty chuckle at his expense. In the last days of October, there will be more opportunities for such amusements. This time from some of our own. I encourage our universities to welcome these speakers.

Comments for this post are now closed

 
 

Comments
76
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- janmB See Profile I'm a Fan of janmB permalink

I have several subjects to hit on ---
I have heard HORROR-WITZ speak. Seems he became controversial to become better known. No one heard of him before.

Know thy enemy may have helped those in DC decide it wasn't worth it to invade IRAQ.

Professors are educated and intelligent and mostly then chose to be democrats.

Religion in our generation has done more harm than good.



    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:19 PM on 10/11/2007
- MFASA See Profile I'm a Fan of MFASA permalink

Muslim students who are concerned about "Islamofascism Awareness Week" at various universities need to publicly address the substance of the allegations being made against Islam. I don't mean events that say "Islam means peace." I mean serious discussions about the Quranic verses and Hadith that the other side is questioning.

These are the sorts of discussions that we promote through Muslims For A Safe America. For example, in the Religion/Identity area, we've put together "debate" handouts (one page, double-sided) on the following issues:
DEBATES ABOUT RELIGION AND IDENTITY
Why Should American Muslims Talk About American National Security?
Should American Muslims Be Loyal To America?
When Are Muslims Required to Fight, And Against Whom?
Should American Muslims Join the American Armed Forces?
Are Western Civilians Legitimate Targets in War?
Should American Muslims Work As Government Informants?
(All these handouts are available at
http://muslimsforasafeamerica.org/?page_id=49 )

Our approach is unique, because we don't present our opinions on these issues. Instead, we just present arguments on both sides of the issues, so that each Muslim can make an informed decision.

Muslim students can use such material to organize "fair and balanced" discussions about these issues. These events would actually begin to answer the real questions that many Americans have about Islam. These discussions would be a great response to the "Islamofascism Awareness Week" events that Muslim students are concerned about.

Of course, I don't expect Muslim students to actually put on these kinds of discussions in the near future, because many young Muslims have generally bought into the mentality that there is no need for us to answer people's questions as long as we say "Islam means peace." Our community"s refusal to answer questions makes others suspicious, and it allows others to dominate the discussion about Islam.

Kamran Memon, Esq.
Muslims For A Safe America
200 S. Michigan Avenue
Suite 1240
Chicago, IL 60604
(312) 961-2354
http://muslimsforasafeamerica.org/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 PM on 10/10/2007
- dannyS See Profile I'm a Fan of dannyS permalink

all you had to say was Santorum and Coulter.
case closed

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:13 PM on 10/10/2007
- MagisterLudi See Profile I'm a Fan of MagisterLudi permalink

Fascism is a loosely defined with a whole series of shades of meaning.
Historical examples of fascism: Germany, Italy, Spain, Hungary, Hussein's Iraq, current Iran, Baathist Syria are but examples of how fascist ideology can be utilized to control and inspire population.

Fascist governments often are based on a particular ideology( Islam) that attempts to dominate and define the national discourse on some exclusive set of Islamic beliefs and place those beliefs above all other loyalties as well create a mobilized community to serve the dominant ideology.

Certainly, Iran fits this description and so do futile fantasies by Islamic radicals. They consider hyper-strict adherence to Islam in all aspects of life: cultural, political, scientific,racial etc as the defining ideology
of the society.
Also these fantasy-states have little resemblance to the actual historical Caliphates. The Caliphates were successful because of their flexibility and relative tolerance and practical
adoptation.
Osama, Hamas' type of ideology is quite different and imply a brutal oppression of any dissent
Hence: Islamo-fascism.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:04 AM on 10/10/2007
- JoePenn See Profile I'm a Fan of JoePenn permalink

Having the mispleasure of living and working in the Middle East (the pleasure was all the Arab countries with hospitality that puts US southern hospitality to shame, in Lebanon, Egypt, Jordan, Qatar, and Syria. Saudi always sucked!). The mispleasure part was the Israel portion.

And JudyGee is in la-la land. The death ratio is 8 to 1 Palestinian children killed to israelis. Even one is horrid, but I don't hear a lot of lamenting of US weapons and tax dollars to kill those children. The overal ratio is 4.5 to 1, Palestinian to israeli.
http://www.ifamericansknew.org/

JudyGee wrote a comic book far above this post. The homes from which Jewish folks were driven inside Arab countries has long been known to be terrorized, not by the local Arab populace, but but the israeli intel and military. Ask any of the former Iraqi Jews inside israel what it was like to find out their own people a couple countries over bombed their neighborhoods to scare them out of Iraq (and other countries).

Sabra and Shatilla were real enough for the fat big aerial the brain-dead (how can they tell?) sharon to driven COMPLETELY out of the IDF. But alas, the hard-liners wanted more Palestinian blood, so they brought the varmint back.

Bottom line: israel has NEVER been attacked unless it attacked firstly. ALL former PM biographies stated this unequivocally, with pride even. This includes repeatedly crossing into Lebanon until the Lebanese finally took action, took 2 soldiers who were illegally inside Lebanon, and the rest is, just as JudyGee spouts, complete fiction from the so-called main-stream media, owned by......ta-da! The same blokes who stroke themselves and each other while vilifying anything Arabic (and Arabs are semites, BTW, while 100 percent of Ashkenazim Jews, that is, 90 percent of all world Jewry, are Ashkenazim and are NOT semites. So it's a ruse to call someone an anti-semite unless they talking about Sephardi Jews, who, by the way, are also considered 2nd class citizens inside that great bastian of democracy, israel).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:32 PM on 10/09/2007
- areacode631 See Profile I'm a Fan of areacode631 permalink

The mandates of radical Islam;
1. Convert
2. Submit
3. Die

It's your choice.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:32 PM on 10/09/2007
- rboylern See Profile I'm a Fan of rboylern permalink

The David Horowitz Freedom Center .....
This is the best laugh I've had in a long time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:01 PM on 10/09/2007
- happytrails See Profile I'm a Fan of happytrails permalink

Let's see: A group of desert nomads wrote a book which said that they had spoken with a god and he gave them eternal rights to a certain piece of property. The nomads then claimed this deed to property was inviolable because the same god declared the nomads were "chosen" by him. Good circular argument here! This would all be dismissable as nonsensical and wishful-thinking mythology, as it had been by most of the world for centuries, except the UN bought it and acted upon it. Thus began 60 years of more violence and global unrest.
So those of us who do not believe the mythology or accept the "sacredness" of the book it is written in (a book written by mortal men and then recopied by other men for thousands of years), must refute the nonsense whenever we can. However we can. And not fight wars to preserve nonsense.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 AM on 10/09/2007
- garymiceli See Profile I'm a Fan of garymiceli permalink

This is all very nice and probably very true and yes, Ann Coulter's brain should some day, preferably sooner than later, be preserved and displayed in the "Totally Whacked and Beyond Evil Brains of Our Time" exhibit in The Science Wing at the Smithsonian.

But I've heard it all, or similar, before. What I haven't heard ... what I am still NOT hearing, is any LOUD NOISE ... any mass protest or attention getting display of disgust from Muslims or the Muslim leaders of the world condemning terrorism and savagry in the name of Islam.

Where is the jihad against the jihadists?

Where is the fatwah against bin Laden, et al?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 AM on 10/09/2007
- GerryDantone See Profile I'm a Fan of GerryDantone permalink

St. Petersberg Declaration:

"We are secular Muslims, and secular persons of Muslim societies. We are believers, doubters, and unbelievers, brought together by a great struggle, not between the West and Islam, but between the free and the unfree.

We affirm the inviolable freedom of the individual conscience. We believe in the equality of all human persons.

We insist upon the separation of religion from state and the observance of universal human rights.

We find traditions of liberty, rationality, and tolerance in the rich histories of pre-Islamic and Islamic societies. These values do not belong to the West or the East; they are the common moral heritage of humankind.

We see no colonialism, racism, or so-called "Islamaphobia" in submitting Islamic practices to criticism or condemnation when they violate human reason or rights.

We call on the governments of the world to reject Sharia law, fatwa courts, clerical rule, and state-sanctioned religion in all their forms; oppose all penalties for blasphemy and apostasy, in accordance with Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human rights; eliminate practices, such as female circumcision, honor killing, forced veiling, and forced marriage, that further the oppression of women; protect sexual and gender minorities from persecution and violence; reform sectarian education that teaches intolerance and bigotry towards non-Muslims; and foster an open public sphere in which all matters may be discussed without coercion or intimidation.

We demand the release of Islam from its captivity to the totalitarian ambitions of power-hungry men and the rigid structures of orthodoxy.

We enjoin academics and thinkers everywhere to embark on a fearless examination of the origins and sources of Islam, and to promulgate the ideals of free scientific and spiritual inquiry through cross-cultural translation, publishing, and the mass media.

We say to Muslim believers: there is a noble future for Islam as a personal faith, not a political doctrine; to Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus, Baha"is, and all members of non-Muslim faith communities: we stand with you as free and equal citizens; and to nonbelievers: we defend your unqualified liberty to question and dissent."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:16 PM on 10/09/2007
- garymiceli See Profile I'm a Fan of garymiceli permalink

Sir,

Thank you for those words and thoughts.

You can add me to your We. Not religiously but as a fellow thinking, compassionate human being stuck on this planet.

Such a shame we are such a minority.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:48 PM on 10/09/2007
- villastrangiato See Profile I'm a Fan of villastrangiato permalink

Gary,

When the west starts pulling its influence out of the Middle East, then your question might begin to have some legitimacy. But as long as we are there, in their face with extraordinary political and military presence in places like Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iraq, Pakistan, and Afghanistan - Arab and Persian extremists will always have a solid argument to justify their war against us. Having a need for their oil doesn't justify invasion, subversion of governments, or the support of ruthless dictators - period.
Your comment is a familiar and tired tactic used by the Israeli appeasers. Muslim clerics have no basis with which to argue against the jihadists even if they wanted to. America has no inherent right to occupy Saudi Arabia and give support to its ruthless dictatorship. Neither did we ever have a right to interfere with the government of Iraq or Iran. Jihadists can only be marginalized or silenced if we stop fueling their animosity by cutting our support of inhumane governments and pulling our mercenaries...ahem....I mean soldiers out of their countries.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:24 AM on 10/09/2007
- garymiceli See Profile I'm a Fan of garymiceli permalink

"When the west starts pulling its influence out of the Middle East, then your question might begin to have some legitimacy."

I agree. And when pigs fly we'll all be swimming peacefully in Blissful Bay.

I don't pretend to have nor see any solution to the greed or ruthlessness or idiocy of it all.

I don't even know what an Israeli appeaser is.

I'm just saying I'm not hearing any messages to Muslims in general from influential Muslims who aren't terrorists.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 PM on 10/09/2007
- Susanholmes See Profile I'm a Fan of Susanholmes permalink

"Where is the fatwah against bin Laden, et al?"

It went missing the day we invaded Iraq. It's a bit of a tough sell to say to a Middle Easterner "Hey, will you help us stop the killing while we're killing your family? We want to stop the killing, you see, and we need you help us stop the killing while we're busy killing."

Like I said, a bit of a Tough Sell

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:52 AM on 10/09/2007
- garymiceli See Profile I'm a Fan of garymiceli permalink

Granted, okay fine and okey dokey, a tough sell in those terms, and maybe naive on my part and certainly impossible until we get the war criminals out of the White House.

The actions of my own government disgust me. In the last seven years I've developed an almost Pavlovian middle finger response to the mere image of George Bush. The sound of his voice makes me ambidextrous.

The fact that this government, any government, doesn't understand and accept the clear fact that terrorism can never be defeated by force boggles my mind.

But I still hear nothing. Nothing from Muslims, nothing even about Muslims killing Muslims. This is not a Sunni vs Shiite football game. This is religious civil war. Muslim children are being slaughtered at the hands of Muslims. Where are the Muslim voices of reason at least regarding that?

The only Muslim voices I hear, the only video messages I see, are those of the terrorists. Where are the rational peace loving Muslims and why are they so quiet?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 PM on 10/09/2007
- professopatra See Profile I'm a Fan of professopatra permalink

Working in the field of Muslim Women's Studies, when I first heard that the "theme" of the week was "Women's Rights in the Muslim World" I almost fell out of my chair. You have to be absolutely joking???

I'm absolutely loving the West's top-down approach to "global feminism", and of course, singling out Muslim women as the poster children for the "cause" is so counterproductive and archaic, not to mention xenophobic, Orientalist, and racist, but really, who's counting the ways?

Having these "scholars" talk about Islamo-fascism and Muslim Women's rights is like having an historian give a keynote address on quantum physics.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:22 AM on 10/09/2007
- villastrangiato See Profile I'm a Fan of villastrangiato permalink

The consolidated effort of right wing zionists to instigate holy war against all muslims, for me, is beginning to explain how Germany could have looked the other way in the 30's and 40's when the death camp horrors began. Walt and Mearsheimer were right, the Israeli lobby is extremely well organized, insanely dedicated to its extreme ideology and tactics, and annoyingly persistent in its obvious and desperate attempts to drill its hate-think into the minds of others. If this behavior is a natural offshoot of Judaism, then I can understand how the conditions came about to scapegoat jews in Germany for the failures and excesses of Germany's misguided military aggression in the first world war. While I'm certainly not condoning anything the fascists did, the behavior we see now brings things into perspective - filling in the gaps. Think about it. If you agressively and ruthlessly invaded other countries and failed - who or where would you look to lay blame. It makes sense that the high ranking creeps in German government would look to the jews to scapegoat - they were thought of as outsiders for the most part - had unusual customs that set them apart, and generally stuck together tightly as a group - kind of the "us against the world" mentality - perfect scapegoats! I always wondered how German citizens could initially allow the holocaust to occur. After the war machine picked up speed, its easy to see how fear played a role. But in the initial stages, if no fear were present - why would they cast fellow jewish citizens aside as scapegoats. Perhaps the jewish community's ability and interest to mobilize on their own behalf to the detriment of the public at large can explain the negative or indifferent feelings toward them as a hole. The concepts of jewish isolationism and self aggrandizing behavior are certainly not new and are well documented. Perhaps there is something in judaism itself that cultivates this behavior in some of the devout, "type A" followers like Dershowitz or Horowitz. Perhaps being the "chosen people" has lead them inexorably down this path of confrontation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:29 AM on 10/09/2007
- karpar See Profile I'm a Fan of karpar permalink

The "devout, 'type A' followers like Dershowitz or Horowitz" are no more representative of all of Judaism than bin Laden is of all Islam, and the "'us against the world' mentality" you perceive is no different from the desire of Christian fundamentalists to remake the United States as an exclusively Christian nation. There are fundamentalists on all sides, and by dint of their loudness, they manage to hijack public perceptions of their more moderate fellows. Judaism carries no sinister undercurrent, though it does have that natural component of almost all religions that tells its followers "You're right, the other guys are wrong, and for that you are special." Acting as though that quality is unique to Judaism or that it creates uniquely power-hungry and scheming mindsets among the Jews is seriously dangerous stuff. I'll take your word for it when you say that you don't condone the actions of the Nazis, and I don't want to fall in with the lot that brands criticism of specific Jews as antisemitism, but I will urge you to remember that any group can be demonized by focusing on its loonier adherents.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:17 PM on 10/09/2007
- Purple Girl See Profile I'm a Fan of Purple Girl permalink

Hallalujah- that last line was the clincher!
WE MUST ALLOW THEM TO SPEAK- but no one has to listen- that's freedom !!
I find my intellegents is always regarded as 'child like' by these 'shut 'em up crowds'. Waht makes them think and act as if they know a damn thing more than I- it's all opinion and opinions and everybodys got one". Freedon of Speech is the right to make an idiot out of yourself in public- even if no one is listening. Laugh, turn 'em off, walk away, tell them off- but NEVER take away their ability to speak their minds (no matter how small). It's amazing how something you've said sounds stupider when it comes out of someone else mouth (perspective-could be a tool to enlightenment). But even more importantly if you shut them up- you too will come under the same restriction. Let them be in MSM, let them run for a political position. If nothing else others will see and hear unpopular their thoughts are and good ol' capitolism will force the 'money' folks to reconsider their 'product'. WE JUST AIN'T BUYING IT !!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:18 AM on 10/09/2007
- BinBaldwin See Profile I'm a Fan of BinBaldwin permalink

Ali Eteraz is defending Islamic Fascism by attacking the enemies of Islamic Fascism. Wale Up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:35 AM on 10/09/2007
- avraamjack See Profile I'm a Fan of avraamjack permalink

.
The Amero-Fascists are the ones who operate under the radar and who need attention.
.
Does anybody here know what the definition of fascism is?
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:14 AM on 10/09/2007
- Sprinkle See Profile I'm a Fan of Sprinkle permalink

Capital 'F' Fascism simply refers to the political system imposed upon Italy during the rule of Benito Mussolini.

Small 'f' fascism is rather more vague, though historically fascist states (or states that are at least largely deemed to be fascistic) have tended to have the following characteristics.
A central focus on the nation state above the individual.
Corparitist economic policies.
A strong tendency towards racial, ethnic of national supremacy.
Intolerance towards those deemed mentally or physically weak.
Belief that struggle and conflict are ends unto themselves.

None of the above have any real relevance to Islamism, even in its most militant form, as Islamists follow a religious and not a nationalistic ideology, Islam is neither racially nor ethnically exclusive, most Islamists consider themselves the 'little guy' fighting against the brutal western superpowers and however brutal their means (and they are often extremely brutal) they are typically aiming for a specific set of political goals.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:27 AM on 10/09/2007
- noamjunior See Profile I'm a Fan of noamjunior permalink

the only "awareness" that needs to be spread in this situation is the awareness that Horowitz is a self-aggrandizing a-hole who would espouse whatever belief that would pay him the most.

The douche bag was a participant in the radical left 60's until he realized there was more money to be made kissing up to Reagan

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:07 AM on 10/09/2007
- bradford See Profile I'm a Fan of bradford permalink

Winston Churchill said that a man who is''nt a socialist by the time He's twenty has no heart.
And a man who is''nt a conservative by the time He's forty has no head.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:45 AM on 10/09/2007
- splashy See Profile I'm a Fan of splashy permalink

Actually, I have seen many that become liberal/socialists AFTER they have had some hard knocks, so that quote is really off base. Since we are all in this together, being a socialistic democrat is actually the most logical. Spread the wealth and health around, and everyone is safer because they are happier.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:12 PM on 10/09/2007
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in